PSC Alliance Forum · 17 November 2026For technology, data, and catering leaders
Connected data. Confident catering.

Move forward with AI. Keep control of your data.

Give a useful business idea a workable foundation: agreed sources, clear ownership, appropriate access, and a practical route to support.

Caterlytix expertise, supported by the Trac platform.

Illustrative leadership team agreeing responsibilities for a data project.
Better information for the people making the decisions.
Explore what better can look like ↓
100%

of in-scope data sources with a named owner

50%

less time preparing a data access review

1 view

of connection status, ownership, and refresh information

Start with the outcome

Make progress with the right boundaries.

A useful first project needs more than a promising prompt. Work through data quality, integration, maintenance, and the people responsible for the result.

Integration and ownership

Who maintains the connection and owns the information?

Reliability

How will the team recognise and handle missing or stale data?

Governed AI

What may the assistant read, use, recommend, or change?

Follow the evidence in one example ↓
A clearer route to the next decision

A clear route from source to decision.

Start with one permitted use. Agree the sources and responsibilities, test what happens when information is incomplete, and keep review points explicit.

Agree the purpose: Define one useful decision and the approved sources.; Control access: Agree permissions, ownership, and processing requirements.; Check the evidence: Inspect quality, refresh, gaps, and failure handling.; Review the action: Set human review and any permitted write-back boundaries.
Agree definitions, data access, and the workflow with the people responsible for the service.
See the decision in practice

One question.
A useful demonstration.

Watch the question, the supporting evidence, and the next decision. The films use illustrative records and clearly labelled conceptual workflows.

Your data. A clear route. Agreed boundaries.

55 seconds · silent · illustrative examples

Agree the purpose, sources, access and review responsibilities as information moves from existing systems to a team decision.

What happens when information is missing?

55 seconds · silent · illustrative examples

Inspect an absent reporting day, identify the missing refresh evidence, and make the source-owner check explicit.

Give AI a useful job and a clear boundary

55 seconds · silent · illustrative examples

Give an assistant a bounded question, choose its permitted tools, keep data changes off, and require human tool approval.

Watch or download all 13 new films ↗Find out what we could explore together ↓
Start here40 minutes · Free · No commitment to further work

Your Catering Data
Confidence Review.

Bring one question you would like to answer with greater confidence. Tap into our catering and technical experience, explore what is getting in the way, and leave with a clearer next step.

  • A practical conversation about your decision and current workflow.
  • A view of the information, people, and access involved.
  • Clarity on whether a worthwhile first improvement is within reach.
Request your free review ↗

What happens in the conversation?

  1. 5 minYour desired outcome
  2. 10 minCurrent workflow and systems
  3. 10 minThe cost or consequence of the problem
  4. 10 minPeople, access, capacity, and funding route
  5. 5 minA useful next step

No data upload is needed for the initial conversation. Invite a colleague who knows the workflow or source information.

What could follow the free review?
Optional paid discovery

Understand the opportunity.

Agree the scope and fee, map the workflow and data, and produce a practical phased plan.

A scoped first implementation

Deliver something useful.

Set responsibilities, dependencies, and measures of success for one independently valuable improvement.

Further improvements

Build where value supports it.

Choose the next phase using the evidence, priorities, and capacity of your team.

A simple next step

Let’s talk about
your data governance question.

Tell us where you would like to start. We can arrange a free review or a conversation at the Forum.

Meet Caterlytix at the PSC Alliance Forum on 17 November at the East Midlands Conference Centre, University of Nottingham.

hello@caterlytix.com ↗

Prefer an online form? Use our contact page ↗

Request a conversation

Your email app will open with the request ready for you to send.

Send the draft from your email app to complete the enquiry. Meeting arrangements are confirmed by the team. Privacy notice.

For your technology team: explore the platform architecture

Discuss hosting, access, source ownership, refresh frequency, failure handling, and any write-back permissions with your technical owner. Supported interfaces and deployment controls are confirmed for the agreed scope.

Trac architecture connecting sources with Core and Console, a client data tenancy, Studio, Agents, and scoped applications.
Agree the actual systems, connections, and controls during scoping.
Open full-size architecture ↗
Watch the existing Trac interface recordings

From a question to a saved report

Agree an agent’s boundaries

These recordings use demonstration fixtures and mock data to show interface patterns.

Sector context and further reading

Sector context reviewed on 19 October 2026. The School Food Review framework is an advocacy proposal. These sources do not constitute supplier endorsement.